Posted by
Big Daddy on Wednesday, May 09, 2007 3:14:29 PM
I’ve noticed an amusing (and somewhat pathetic) trend in recent days. As the newly-minted Democratic congressional majority enters the last stages of settling in, liberals across the country feel emboldened to wave their flags proudly. Gone are the stifling days of conservative control with its high-sounding morals and musty absolute truth by which we were all judged. Enter the crisp days of freedom with their bracing winds of change bringing acceptance and equal treatment for all.
That’s what liberals would have you believe anyway, especially those grappling for the Democratic presidential nomination. But here’s the irony: The more emboldened they become to preach their brand freedom, the more they expose just how loony and out-of-touch they are with a majority of Americans, the very group they claim to represent. Try as they might, they just can’t conceal their true agendas for very long.
A few examples:
It seems Hillary’s campaign is trying to regain balance after slipping on loose gravel thrown in its path by the Family Research Council (FRC). After news leaked that Clinton accepted $800,000 dollars from a fund raiser hosted by misogynistic sleaze rapper Timbaland, FRC encouraged folks to contact campaign headquarters and voice their opinion, which they did. How did the campaign respond to complaints that Hillary accepted money from a profane performer? Apparently by using profanity themselves. The FRC’s Tom McClusky said he was on the receiving end of a string of F-bombs dropped by a campaign worker. Campaign leaders later said the worker's comments were not consistent with the kind of tone they’re setting. Notice the response did not condemn either Timbaland's or the campaign worker’s use of profanity, but merely said the language could have been communicated in a way more consistent with the tone of the campaign.
Hey Hillary, here’s a way to get those female votes; just use money from a crowd that enjoys hearing performers rhyme about various ways to use women as objects for sexual abuse.
Then there’s John Edwards, tap dancing his way to the bank while looking appropriately sympathetic for the poor. Edwards said the time he spent reaping from, I mean working for a hedge fund gave him an opportunity to learn how monetary markets relate to poverty. I guess the lesson being, “I’m rich and they’re poor. Yep, we’re different all right.” The millionaire candidate loves to trot out his father’s blue-collar occupation but neglects to inform his fellow “common man” just how much money sits in his account. He’ll fight for you all right, assuming the retainer is large enough.
Lastly, is a bizarre man who thinks the world can be saved by genocide. Paul Watson, founder of the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society says humans are a disease and their numbers should be reduced by more than five million. We’ve all heard kooky ideas like this before, most falling under the eugenics movement championed by folks like the founder of Planned Parenthood, Margaret Sanger and the liberal’s favorite boogey-man Adolf Hitler.
How come people who believe the human race should be smaller never think of starting with themselves, as an example to us all?
While it was a setback in the battle to restore America to her conservative roots, last November’s elections may have done more to advance traditional ideas than a continued Republican majority. If liberals will only keep talking, their true colors will be revealed. Time is on conservative’s side, because no one can double-speak forever.
Well, maybe Jesse Jackson.
Read more of my articles here!